Robbing Peter to Pay the Penguins

miner-and-arena

Consol Energy Gets Naming Rights for Arena

Published: Dec. 16, 2008 at 3:30 PM

PITTSBURGH, Dec. 16 (UPI) — The coal and gas company Consol Energy Inc. (NYSE:CNX) has won the naming rights for the new Pittsburgh Penguins hockey arena.

The deal means that the arena will be known as the Consol Energy Center for 21 years after its opening for the 2010-2011 season, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. The team has not released the amount of money involved, but Consol is believed to be paying millions of dollars (a year).


Consol Energy Mine Closure To Put 260 Out Of Work

Monday, January 5, 2009 – updated: 4:31 pm EST January 5, 2009

Consol Energy plans to close its 84 Mine in southwestern Pennsylvania in about two months, citing dropping coal prices in the sluggish economy.About 260 miners work at the mine in Amwell Township, about 25 miles south of Pittsburgh.

Prosperity Gospel of Another Sort

Russell H. Conwell (February 15, 1843 – December 6, 1925) was the founder of Temple University. He was a Baptist minister,  a lawyer and well known for his speeches and sermons, the most famous of which also became a popular book of the same name;  Acres of Diamonds. The title is in reference to a man who spent all his life looking for fortune, never realizing that the property he sold to finance his travels would later be the site of the Kimberly diamond field.

Preaching this sermon over six thousand times (which reputedly earned him over $8,000,000 dollars), Conwell greatly influenced the Social Gospel that was emerging during the Gilded Age and this speech was  said to have such a significant and lasting impact upon American politics that it can still be felt today.  I found the it to be fascinating and present it here with no additional commentary:

I say that you ought to get rich, and it is your duty to get rich. How many of my pious brethren say to me, “Do you, a Christian minister, spend your time going up and down the country advising young people to get rich, to get money?” “Yes, of course I do.” They say, “Isn’t that awful! Why don’t you preach the gospel instead of preaching about man’s making money?” “Because to make money honestly is to preach the gospel:’ That is the reason. The men who get rich may be the most honest men you can find in the community.

“Oh”, but says some young man here tonight, “I have been told all my life that if a person has money he is very dishonest and dishonorable and mean and contemptible:’ My friend, that is the reason why you have none, because you have that idea of people. The foundation of your faith is altogether false. Let me say here clearly, and say it briefly, though subject to discussion which I have not time for here, ninety-eight out of one hundred of the rich men of America are honest. That is why they are rich. That is why they are trusted with money. That is why they carryon great enterprises and find plenty of people to work with them. It is because they are honest men.

Says another young man, “I hear sometimes of men that get millions of dollars dishonestly” Yes, of course you do, and so do I. But they are so rare a thing in fact that the newspapers talk about them all the time as a matter of news until you get the idea that all the other rich men got rich dishonestly.

My friend, you take and drive me - if you furnish the auto - out into the suburbs of Philadelphia, and introduce me to the people who own their homes around this great city, those beautiful homes with gardens and flowers, those magnificent homes so lovely in their art, and I will introduce you to the very best people in character as well as in enterprise in our city, and you know I will. A man is not really a true man until he owns his own home, and they that own their homes are made more honorable and honest and pure, and true and economical, by owning the home.

For a man to have money, even in large sums, is not an inconsistent thing. We preach against covetousness, and you know we do, in the pulpit, and oftentimes preach against it so long and use the terms about “filthy lucre” so extremely that Christians get the idea that when we stand in the pulpit we believe it is wicked for any man to have money-until the collection basket goes around, and then we almost swear at the people because they don’t give more money. Oh, the inconsistency of such doctrines as that!.

Money is power, and you ought to be reasonably ambitious to have it. You ought because you can do more good with it than you could do without it. Money printed your Bible, money builds your churches, money sends your missionaries, and money pays your preachers, and you would not have many of them, either, if you did not pay them. I am always willing that my church should raise my salary, because the church that pays the largest salary always raises it the easiest. You never knew an exception to it in your life. The man who gets the largest salary can do the most good with the power that is furnished to him. Of course he can, if his spirit be right to use it for what it is given to him.

I say, then, you ought to have money. If you can honestly attain unto riches in Philadelphia, it is your Christian and godly duty to do so. It is an awful mistake of those pious people to think you must be awfully poor in order to be pious.

Some men say, “Don’t you sympathize with the poor people?” Of course I do, or else I would not have been lecturing these years. I won’t give in but what I sympathize with the poor, but the number of poor who are to be sympathized with is very small. To sympathize with a man whom God has punished for his sins, thus to help him when God would still continue a just punishment, is to do wrong, no doubt about it, and we do that more than we help those who are deserving.

While we should sympathize with God’s poor-that is, those who cannot help themselves - let us remember there is not a poor person in the United States who was not made poor by his own shortcomings, or by the short-comings of someone else. It is all wrong to be poor, anyhow. Let us give in to that argument and pass that to one side.

A gentleman gets up back there, and says, “Don’t you think there are some things in this world that are better than money?” Of course I do, but I am talking about money now. Oh yes, I know by the grave that has left me standing alone that there are some things in the world that are higher and sweeter and purer than money. Well do I know there are some things higher and grander than gold. Love is the grandest thing on God’s earth, but fortunate the lover who has plenty of money. Money is power, money is force, money will do good, as well as harm. In the hands of good men and women it could accomplish, and it has accomplished, good.

I hate to leave that behind me. I heard a man get up in a prayer-meeting in our city and thank the Lord he was “one of God’s poor.” Well, I wonder what his wife thinks about that? She earns all the money that comes into that house, and he smokes a part of that on the veranda. I don’t want to see any more of the Lord’s poor of that kind, and I don’t believe the Lord does. And yet there are some people who think in order to be pious you must be awfully poor and awfully dirty. That does not follow at all. While we sympathize with the poor, let us not teach a doctrine like that.

-Russell H. Conwell

Why Was Jesus Baptized?

the-perfect-lamb

Question: If Jesus was born and lived without sin, as we can see from these scriptures:

2 Corinthians 5:21: “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”

Hebrews 4:15:For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.”

1 Peter 2:21-22: “…because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth.”

1John 3:5: “And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.”

And his cousin John baptized those seeking repentance and forgiveness of sin:

Acts 19: 4 “….Paul said, “John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance.”

Mark 1:4 “And so John came, baptizing in the desert region and preaching a for the forgiveness of sins…

Then why did Jesus come to the Jordan to be baptized?

Mark 1:9 “At that time Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan.”


Revising St. George

My wife and I just came back from a weekend in Philadelphia.  Not only was the city dressed up for Christmas there was a very visible acknowledgment of the Hanukkah holidays.  Nearly as many Menorahs were displayed as there were wreaths and trees, which should not be surprising considering Philadelphia’s Quaker roots and their reputation for religious tolerance.

Just outside of Philly can be found the Valley Forge National Historic Park, commemorating the place where the Continental Army spent the dismal winter of 1777 - 1778. Everyone knows this story of courage and fortitude and it has become not only a significant part of our historical memory it has also worked its way into the American mythos.

What follows are some of the most famous iconic pictures that America has to offer: different views of Washington praying at Valley Forge.  Unfortunately they depict something that probably never took place. At the very least, no one has ever admitted to witnessing this event.

Even a cursory look at history plainly shows that Washington was not a Christian.  Along with most of our nation’s founders he was a Stoic and a Deist.  Deists are not known to pray for divine intercession (it dismayed some of his friends and family that Washington never uttered a prayer on his death bed) so these paintings more than likely represent a fiction

Not too long ago these depictions of Washington were correctly removed from school text books, the act of which had many social and religious  conservatives up in arms.  It was referred to as an excess of revisionist history yet it is obvious this was a corrective measure. The ‘re-visioning’ was originally and inaccurately done quite some time ago.

Why do so many Christians feel that it is necessary to push for the Christianity of men like Washington?  If you have Christ, who else do you need?

“Every American considers it his sacred duty to have a likeness of Washington in his house, just as we have the image of God’s saints” - an anonymous European visitor to America in 1815 (reported by Marcus Cunliffe)

George Washington Praying at Valley Forge

Stained Glass Window Congressional Chapel


Joy to the World? Seriously?

According to UNICEF, 26,500-30,000 children die each day due to poverty. And they “die quietly in some of the poorest villages on earth, far removed from the scrutiny and the conscience of the world. Being meek and weak in life makes these dying multitudes even more invisible in death.”

Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.

Matthew 5:8

First Spiritual, then Ethnic Cleansing

Having been reminded by the recent sentencing of a Rwandan war criminal to life in prison, Heather, our minister, shared something with us yesterday that completely stunned me. I had no idea that the vast majority of those who took part in the Rwandan genocide were Christian. I’d read about the killings in the newspapers at the time (although I don’t think the Western press really covered this all too well) and had seen “Hotel Rwanda” but all I seemed to remember was that this bit of nastiness was based upon intense tribal animosity.

To the ’sophisticated’ Western ear it is easy to dismiss such barbarism when the word ‘tribe’ is heard. And why should we be outraged over a bunch of Hutus and Tutsis hacking each other to pieces with machetes? Most us, who learned about Africa from Tarzan and Jungle Jim, would expect nothing different. But Christians? The Saved? Today? We just don’t do such things. Horrors like this belong in the church’s distant past, along with the Crusades, the Inquisition and the Puritan Witch Trials.

Why isn’t this common knowledge, especially among Christians?

Since then I’ve done a little bit of research and have come to find that these tribal rivalries had actually been encouraged by the colonial powers, assisted by the church, in order to keep the populace under productive and profitable control. The colonial missionaries did a good job for their bosses; over 95% of the Rwandan population are self proclaimed Christians. However, their faith did nothing to discourage them from hating their ‘enemies’ and even many of their church leaders were complicit in this savage butchery. According to the Afrol News:

The 1994 Rwandan genocide, killing an estimated 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus, is made even more incomprehensible by the documented participation of many representatives of Rwandan church societies. How could God fearing nuns, and even a bishop, take part in the most cruel crimes against humanity committed on African soil? Even worse, several church societies allegedly were co-responsible for the growing hatred that led to the genocide. It remains an enormous contradiction to the Christian Message of Love.

On 7 May 1994 soldiers and militias arrived at Shyogwe Diocese aboard a red pick-up vehicle to transport civilian Tutsi refugees to the killing sites. “On that day Bishop Samuel Musabyimana was present and, addressing the soldiers and militias, publicly stated that he did not oppose the killing of Tutsis, but that he did not want killings at the Diocese and that the Tutsis should be taken to Kabgayi to be killed.” (Indictment by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda against former Anglican Bishop Samuel Musabyimana).

On 22 April 1994, Séraphine Mukamana had hidden herself in a garage when militias attacked a convent in Sovu in southern Rwanda. “We sought refugee in the garage and closed and barricaded the doors. Outside a bloodbath is going on. Suddenly an orphan begins to weep as it gets to hot in the garage. At once, the killers approach the garage.” As the refugees refuse to come out, the militia leader Emmanuel Rekeraho decides to burn them alive in the garage. “‘The nuns are coming to help us. They are bringing gasoline,’ I heard [Rekeraho] say. Looking through a hole that the militiamen meanwhile had made in the wall, I indeed saw Sister Gertrude and Sister Kisito. The latter was carrying a petrol can. Shortly upon that, the garage is set on fire.” ( Testimony against two Catholic nuns, Sisters Gertrude and Maria Kisito in a Brussels court, May 2001 [for their involvement in the slaughter of at least 5,000 civilians that had sought refuge in their monastery at Sovu])…..

… The accusations against clergy of the Free Methodist, Presbyterian, Baptist and Seventh-Day Adventist Churches are equally shocking. According to survivors, Bishop Aaron Ruhumuliza, head of the Free Methodist Church in Gikondo, Kigali, helped the militia carry out a massacre in his own church on 9 April 1994. Michel Twagirayesu, the President of the Presbyterian Church of Rwanda and a former vice-president of the World Council of Churches, is alleged to have worked closely with the killers in the Presbyterian stronghold of Kirinda, Kibuye, betraying parishioners and fellow-clergy alike, according to a report by African Rights.

How can we explain this? Why would 20th century Christians commit such sadistic and brutal acts of violence? Perhaps, as some African church leaders are suggesting, it is because they were converted by the Western missionaries to a Gospel of Evacuation and not;

A Gospel of Transformation

Much of the history of Western missionary activity in Africa, although often well-intentioned, presented a truncated and paternalistic form of the gospel. Claude Nikondeha, founder of Amahoro Africa, has called this the ‘Evacuation Gospel’, which aimed at saving souls but did little to transform the reality of African Christians suffering extreme poverty and colonial oppression. And yet the gospel of Jesus Christ as the good news of the establishment of the Kingdom of God is so much more – it is in all spheres of life truly transformative.

While the missionaries placed salvific emphasis on what comes after this present life, there was little emphasis placed on changing their world for the good of all. Of course that would involve upsetting the colonial economic applecart and besides, if you’ve saved their souls then your job is done. Right? The Rwandan genocide would suggest that this reasoning is severely flawed. Which is one reason why emerging church leaders like Brian McLaren have been crying out that:

Everything Must Change

In his most recent book with the above title, Brian McLaren shows how the economic and political structures of the modern West have created a lethal suicide machine which destroys the very things vital for the survival of humanity and planet Earth. He argues that the real message of Jesus Christ encompasses an alternative reality and that His followers are called to make this Kingdom vision a reality.

Like the Nazi led Holocaust, the Rwandan Genocide has called into question the merits and authenticity of Christianity. Meanwhile it has made Islam that much more attractive to many Africans. Rwandan Muslims were known to have sheltered both Hutus and Tutsis from their blood thirsty Christian brothers and sisters:

Nov 10 2002 - After the sliver of the new moon had been sighted, Saleh Habimana joined the growing ranks of Muslims in this central African nation and began the daylight fasting that marks the holy month of Ramadan.

Later, Rwanda’s leading Muslim cleric joined men in embroidered caps and boys in school uniforms to pray at the overflowing Al-Fatah mosque - more testimony to the swelling numbers of Muslims in this predominantly Christian country.

Though Muslims remain a small percentage of Rwanda’s 8 million people, Islam is on the rise eight years after the 1994 genocide brought 100 days of murder, terror and mayhem. More than 500,000 minority Tutsis and political moderates from the Hutu majority were killed by Hutu militiamen, soldiers and ordinary citizens in a slaughter orchestrated by the extremist Hutu government then in power.

“For Hutus, conversion to Islam was like purification, a way of getting rid of a stigma,” Habimana said. “After the genocide, Hutus felt that the society perceives them as having blood on their hands.”…

…As Rwandan Christian Tutsis and Hutus try to reconcile, their Muslim countrymen believe they could learn something about tolerance and solidarity from Islam.

“Reconciliation is not necessary for Muslims in Rwanda, because we do not view the world through a racial or ethnic lens,” Sagahutu said.

Muslim Village

The Rwandan Genocide should remind Christians that before we so glibly paint other cultures and religions as murderous and barbaric we need to address those vicious tendencies that continue to find shelter within the modern church.

Having Your Bible and Eating it Too

bible-cake